How Trump’s golf course plan could change the US water supply
As the Trump administration mulls whether to build a $2.6 billion golf course near the Gulf of Mexico, it may be a good idea to look at the potential impact on the US waterways.
“The project is the most environmentally significant project that I have seen in the United States,” says Mark Zeller, president of the Environmental Defense Fund.
Zeller is the author of the book The New Environmentalism: How Our Environmental Crisis Will Transform the World.
“It could have an enormous impact on how water is used in the US.”
The Gulf of America, a tributary of the Mississippi River, flows through parts of the Gulf states of Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.
Its tributaries feed into the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, and are used by farmers and ranchers.
But as a result of climate change, water quality and the effects of heavy metals such as lead have all declined dramatically.
Zeller says the Trump Administration’s plan could result in “a dramatic reduction in water supplies to the Mississippi.”
The proposal, which could be finalized as early as next week, is expected to add about $2 billion to the Gulf’s water supply, according to a leaked document seen by The Wall St. Journal.
Zellers water plan would require the use of water from the Colorado River.
The Colorado flows through the state and into the Gulf, and supplies about 75% of the United State’s water.
Zellers proposed plan would allow for the use, and for future expansion of, the Colorado.
The federal government estimates that the plan would reduce the amount of water needed for agriculture and other water uses by about 20%.
Water quality issuesThe proposed project would add about 20 million gallons of water to the aquifer that runs through the Mississippi.
That is less than the amount that would be needed to meet demand for drinking water and other uses.
The additional water would be diverted to fill the aquifers of rivers such as the Missouri River.
Water from the Missouri would then be transferred to other rivers.
Zelleers proposal also would require increased use of chemical fertilizers.
The proposed plan, which would cost about $1 billion, would allow the use and expansion of chemicals such as herbicides that are not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) chemical endangerment list, according a document seen By The Wall